Assessment of Kinesio Taping Versus Phonophoresis for the Treatment of Painful Hallux Valgus: A Pilot Study

  • Parisa Taheri 1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan
  • Razieh Maghroori 1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan
  • Aidin Heidari 1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan
Keywords: Hallux Valgus; Kinesiotape; Phonophoresis; Pain

Abstract

Background: Hallux valgus (HV) is a deformity that affects the quality of life and function in a negative manner causing disturbed balance and walking and even alters the foot kinematics. Conservative treatments are the choice for mild to moderate HV, but the question about the best method has not been responded yet. In the current study, it is aimed to assess and compare the efficacy of kinesiotaping (KT) versus phonophoresis (PH) for the treatment of painful HV. Materials and Methods: This randomized clinical trial has been conducted on a total number of 37 toes (37 toes of a total number of 24 patients) randomly divided into two subgroups of either KT or PH with 1% hydrocortisone among which the total numbers of 31 toes from 20 patients fulfilled the study protocol. The variables including pain (using VAS score), function (using Manchester-Oxford Foot questionnaire)(MOXFD), hallux valgus angle (HVA), and intermetatarsal angle (IMA) were assessed and compared between two groups before and after two months following the interventions. Results: The pain score decreased significantly within the time in both groups (P-value<0.001), while the comparison of KT with PH revealed insignificant difference (P-value=0.08). MOXFD assessments showed significantly improved status within two months for both interventions (P-value<0.001) with no remarkable difference between the groups (P-value=0.55). The IMA and HVA altered following both of the techniques. KT was superior to PH for the correction of HVA, but not for IMA (P-value>0.05). Conclusion: We found both of the KT and PH techniques could successfully rehabilitate the patients’ pain and improve function, however the KT was slightly better than PH due to HVA reduction. [GMJ.2021;10:e1888]

References

Plaass C, Karch A, Koch A, Wiederhoeft V, Ettinger S, Claassen L, et al. Short term results of dynamic splinting for hallux valgus-A prospective randomized study. Foot Ankle Surg. 2020;26(2):146-50.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2019.01.002

PMid:30718168

Nix S, Smith M, Vicenzino B. Prevalence of hallux valgus in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J FOOT ANKLE RES. 2010;3(1):21.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-3-21

PMid:20868524 PMCid:PMC2955707

Coughlin MJ, Jones CP. Hallux valgus: demographics, etiology, and radiographic assessment. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(7):759-77.

https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2007.0759

PMid:17666168

Easley ME, Trnka H-J. Current concepts review: hallux valgus part 1: pathomechanics, clinical assessment, and nonoperative management. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(5):654-9.

https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2007.0654

PMid:17559782

Kavlak Y, Simsek E, Erel S, Mutlu A, Bek N, Yakut Y, et al. Effect of structural foot deformities on foot function in the elderly. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon. 2006;17(2):84.

Menz HB, Roddy E, Thomas E, Croft PR. Impact of hallux valgus severity on general and foot-specific health-related quality of life. Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(3):396-404.

https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20396

PMid:21080349

Deschamps K, Birch I, Desloovere K, Matricali GA. The impact of hallux valgus on foot kinematics: a cross-sectional, comparative study. GAIT POSTURE. 2010;32(1):102-6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.03.017

PMid:20451392

Tang SF, Chen CP, Pan J-L, Chen J-L, Leong C-P, Chu N-K. The effects of a new foot-toe orthosis in treating painful hallux valgus. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(12):1792-5.

https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.34835

PMid:12474189

Hwang D, Ahn S, Kim B, Bok S. How can biomechanical foot orthosis affect gait in arthritis with hallux valgus? Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;61:e397.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2018.05.927

Akaras E, Guzel NA, Kafa N, Özdemir YA. The acute effects of two different rigid taping methods in patients with hallux valgus deformity. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2019(Preprint):1-8.

https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-181150

PMid:31033456

Karabicak GO, Bek N, Tiftikci U. Short-Term Effects of Kinesiotaping on pain and joint alignment in conservative treatment of hallux valgus. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2015;38(8):564-71.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2015.09.001

PMid:26435086

Logterman SL, Hunt KJ. Hallux Rigidus. Sports Injuries of the Foot and Ankle: Springer; 2019. p. 259-64.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58704-1_23

Reina M, Lafuente G, Munuera PV. Effect of custom-made foot orthoses in female hallux valgus after a one-year follow-up. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2013;37(2):113-9.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364612447097

PMid:22691724

Torkki M, Malmivaara A, Seitsalo S, Hoikka V, Laippala P, Paavolainen P. Hallux valgus: immediate operation versus one year of waiting with or without orthoses: a randomized controlled trial of 209 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74(2):209-15.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470310013987

PMid:12807332

Jeon MY, Jeong HC, Jeong MS, Lee YJ, Kim JO, Lee ST, et al. Effects of taping therapy on the deformed angle of the foot and pain in hallux valgus patients. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2004;34(5):685-92.

https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2004.34.5.685

PMid:15502433

Radwan NL, Mohamed MA, Ibrahim AR. Conventional Tape versus Kinesiotape for Hallux Valgus Correction. IJMRHS. 2017;6(1):71-8.

Grampurohit N, Pradhan S, Kartin D. Efficacy of adhesive taping as an adjunt to physical rehabilitation to influence outcomes post-stroke: a systematic review. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2015;22(1):72-82.

https://doi.org/10.1179/1074935714Z.0000000031

PMid:25776123

Ashraf A, Namazi M, Taheri P, Soltaninia Z. Effect of phonophoresis in increasing uptake of clobetasol for the treatment of pretibial myxedema: A case report. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. 2010;20(75):89-91.

Sedhom MG. Efficacy of kinesio-taping versus phonophoresis on knee osteoarthritis: an experimental study. Int. J. Physiother. 2016;3(4):494-9.

https://doi.org/10.15621/ijphy/2016/v3i4/111062

Gurney AB, Wascher D, Schenck R, Tennison A, Jaramillo B. Absorption of hydrocortisone acetate in human connective tissue using phonophoresis. Sports health. 2011;3(4):346-51.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738111405970

PMid:23016027 PMCid:PMC3445200

Bayar B, Erel S, ŞİMŞEK İE, SÜMER E, Bayar K. The effects of taping and foot exercises on patients with hallux valgus: a preliminary study. Turk J Med Sci. 2011;41(3):403-9.

Coughlin MJ, Saltzman CL, Nunley JA. Angular measurements in the evaluation of hallux valgus deformities: a report of the ad hoc committee of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society on angular measurements. Foot Ankle Int. 2002;23(1):68-74.

https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070202300114

PMid:11822697

Srivastava S, Chockalingam N, El Fakhri T. Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: comparison between manual and computer-assisted measurements. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010;49(6):523-8.

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2010.07.012

PMid:20833569

Kleinkort JA, Wood F. Phonophoresis with 1 percent versus 10 percent hydrocortisone. Phys Ther. 1975;55(12):1320-4.

https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/55.12.1320

PMid:1197356

Mousavian A, Ebrahimzadeh MH, Birjandinejad A, Omidi-Kashani F, Kachooei AR. Translation and cultural adaptation of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) into the Persian language. The Foot. 2015;25(4):224-7.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2015.07.004

PMid:26365951

Perera A, Mason L, Stephens M. The pathogenesis of hallux valgus. JBJS. 2011;93(17):1650-61.

https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.01630

PMid:21915581

Öztürk G, Külcü DG, Mesci N, Şilte AD, Aydog E. Efficacy of Kinesio tape application on pain and muscle strength in patients with myofascial pain syndrome: a placebo-controlled trial. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28(4):1074-9.

https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.1074

PMid:27190430 PMCid:PMC4868190

Choi J-H. Effects of Kinesio Taping and Stretching on Hallux Valgus Angle and Balance in Female Hallux Valgus Patients. Res J Pharm Technol. 2017;10(9):2926-30.

https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00517.0

Choi JH, Kim NJ, An HJ. Effect of Kinesiotaping and Joint Mobilization on The Metatarsophalangeal Joint Angle and Pain in Hallux Valgus Patients. JIAPTR. 2017;8(2):1152-7.

https://doi.org/10.20540/JIAPTR.2017.8.2.1152

Kim JY, Kim SY. Effects of Kinesio tape compared with non-elastic tape on handgrip strength. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28(5):1565-8.

https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.1565

PMid:27313372 PMCid:PMC4905911

Baktir S, Ozdincler AR, Mutlu EK, Bilsel K. The short-term effectiveness of low-level laser, phonophoresis, and iontophoresis in patients with lateral epicondylosis. J Hand Ther. 2018; 32(4): 417-25.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2018.01.002

PMid:29452929

Klaiman MD, Shrader JA, Danoff JV, Hicks JE, Pesce WJ, Ferland J. Phonophoresis versus ultrasound in the treatment of common musculoskeletal conditions. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998;30(9):1349-55.

https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-199809000-00002

Published
2021-05-12
How to Cite
Taheri, P., Maghroori, R., & Heidari, A. (2021). Assessment of Kinesio Taping Versus Phonophoresis for the Treatment of Painful Hallux Valgus: A Pilot Study. Galen Medical Journal, 10, e1888. https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v10i0.1888