Cover Image

New Modalities and Approaches in Stroke Rehabilitation

hooman Mahmoudi

During recent years, our understanding of recovery after stroke has changed dramatically. As a result, some new approaches and technologies have emerged to help stroke survivors improve even years after the accident. I am trying to introduce some of the most recent and scientifically investigated approaches and technologies used in stroke rehabilitation. Technologies and approaches such as intensive task-specific approach, repetitive Transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, virtual reality rehabilitation, robotic rehabilitation.

Stroke, Rehabilitation, transcranial stimulation;, virtual reality rehabilitation;, robotic rehabilitation.

Nudo RJ, Larson D, Plautz EJ, Friel KM, Barbay S, Frost SB. A squirrel monkey model of poststroke motor recovery. ILAR Journal. 2003 ;44(2):161-74.

Nudo RJ. Postinfarct cortical plasticity and behavioral recovery. Stroke. 2007 ;38(2):840-5.

Nudo RJ. Mechanisms for recovery of motor function following cortical damage. Current opinion in neurobiology. 2006 ;16(6):638-44.

Nudo RJ, Friel KM. Cortical plasticity after stroke: implications for rehabilitation. Revue neurologique. 1998 ;155(9):713-7.

Schmidt RA. Motor control and performance: From principles to practice. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. 1991.

Ungerleider LG. Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning. Nature. 1995 ;377(6545):155-8.

Classen J, Liepert J, Wise SP, Hallett M, Cohen LG. Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice. Journal of neurophysiology. 1998 ;79(2):1117-23.

Fregni F, Boggio PS, Valle AC, Rocha RR, Duarte J, Ferreira MJ, et al. A sham-controlled trial of a 5-day course of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Stroke. 2006 ;37(8):2115-22.

Hsu WY, Cheng CH, Liao KK, Lee IH, Lin YY. Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Motor Functions in Patients With Stroke A Meta-Analysis. Stroke. 2012 ;43(7):1849-57.

Mahmoudi H, Haghighi AB, Petramfar P, Jahanshahi S, Salehi Z, Fregni F. Transcranial direct current stimulation: electrode montage in stroke. Disability and rehabilitation. 2011 ;33(15-16):1383-8.

Butler AJ, Shuster M, O'Hara E, Hurley K, Middlebrooks D, Guilkey K. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation for upper limb motor recovery in stroke survivors. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2013 ;26(2):162-71.

Merians AS, Jack D, Boian R, Tremaine M, Burdea GC, Adamovich SV, et al. Virtual reality–augmented rehabilitation for patients following stroke. Physical therapy. 2002 ;82(9):898-915.

Saposnik G, Levin M, Stroke Outcome Research Canada (SORCan) Working Group. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation a meta-analysis and implications for clinicians. Stroke. 2011 ;42(5):1380-6.

Laver K, George S, Thomas S, Deutsch JE, Crotty M. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation: an abridged version of a Cochrane review. European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine. 2015 ;51(4):497-506.

Lum P, Reinkensmeyer D, Mahoney R, Rymer WZ, Burgar C. Robotic devices for movement therapy after stroke: current status and challenges to clinical acceptance. Topics in stroke rehabilitation. 2002 ;8(4):40-53.

Prange GB, Jannink MJ, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG, Hermens HJ, IJzerman MJ. Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Journal of rehabilitation research and development. 2006 ;43(2):171.

Mehrholz J, Elsner B, Werner C, Kugler J, Pohl M. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke updated evidence. Stroke. 2013 ;44(10):e127-8.


  • There are currently no refbacks.